Posts tagged green building
Posts tagged green building
I recently tweeted a piece by my old friend Chris G. Hill in which he mused on the state of green building certification. I don’t want to further synthesize his post, since he was largely recapping the work of Matthew Bouchard. Both posts are worth their own read but they both circle around the same central question. What is the role of LEED in today’s green building industry? LEED has plenty of detractors and plenty of promoters. It’s been controversial since it’s inception. Whether you think LEED has been good for green building or terrible, I want to ask a broader and more existential question – Is LEED relevant? I don’t ask this to be controversial or contrarian, and I don’t ask it out of disrespect for the USGBC and the good work people have done in that organization. I ask it because of what I do every day.
For those of you who haven’t been following, I work as a representative for SDA Lighting. I help businesses and institutions lower their energy consumption (and costs) by presenting alternative lighting strategies. I’ve been there since September and I’ve worked on a wide variety of projects including new office space, ice rinks, parking lots and auto dealers. In all of my conversations with a wide variety of clients the concepts of LEED ratings or the concepts trumpeted by the USGBC have come up exactly zero times.
What’s driving the pushing for sustainable lighting in the NY Metro area? It’s a few things:
I’d like to focus on that last point for a second. For all of the talk about certifications from governing bodies like the USGBC and the prestige of the LEED plaque, in reality, what’s incentivizing the move to LED is the economics. Not just the economics of energy savings over the long term, but the economics of rebates in the near term. These incentives are driven by the simple fact that the utilities see more value in reducing energy demand than in building more transmission capacity.
This is an example of the positive economics of sustainability. Whatever your political leanings or feelings about government intervention, it’s easy to see the math of upgrading to new energy saving LED. That’s not driven by ideology it’s driven by the cold hard numbers. Which brings me back to the idea of LEED and the USGBC. For better or worse, the rarefied air of LEED and green building doesn’t feel welcoming. Certification is complicated, it’s expensive and the value of it is questionable. It’s hard for me to pitch LEED certification. For existing buildings working with slender budgets, the idea of a massive renovation to achieve LEED status is beyond daunting. Energy and revenue savings are clear and universal, I don’t have to explain their value. I can’t say the same for LEED certification.
I realize I’m only speaking about my narrow little corner of the design/build industry, so I can’t make a definitive statement of the value or relevance of LEED. What I can say is that there are far more existing buildings than there is new construction. These projects are often smaller in scope but dollar for dollar are incredibly impactful in terms of energy savings, and LEED has nothing to say about them.
What are your thoughts? Are you working on LEED projects? The comment section awaits.
I found this article over at gbNYC. I think it’s a terrific example of what’s possible when a client is truly committed to building green and not only invests in their space, but thinks about long term rules. The client is WilmerHale, an NYC law firm. The article by Stephen del Percio explains the “split-incentive” problem and how this firm is trying to address it.
Here are a couple of quotes from the article.
WilmerHale announced last week that its New York City office at Silverstein Properties’ 7 World Trade Center has been awarded LEED for Commercial Interiors Gold certification…
Just as important as the current LEED specification is their effort to address the so-called split incentive…
WilmerHale’s LEED certification isn’t the only environmental milestone the law firm has celebrated in connection with its 7 World Trade Center offices. It remains the only private sector tenant – to our knowledge – that has implemented New York City’s Energy Aligned Clause within a commercial office lease. As you may recall, the Clause was developed by a task force organized by the Mayor’s Office of Long-Term Planning and Sustainability. It aims to address the much-discussed split incentive, which remains prevalent in most commercial office leases in New York City and refers to the scenario where a landlord pays for building capital improvements but does not benefit from any reductions in operating expenses that are created because its tenants pay for operating expenses under the terms of the lease.
Just a little more explanation…
The Clause aims to address this imbalance: once qualifying improvements are made, tenants should not only realize actual savings, but will pay the landlord 80 percent of their projected savings as assessed by an independent, NYSERDA-approved engineer (creating a buffer in case savings are not as projected) as part of building operating costs. After the payback period (cost divided by projected savings) for the improvement expires and compensates the landlord for its investment, the tenant continues to enjoy the benefits of the energy savings.
Anyone that’s followed me on tumblr or on twitter for awhile knows how much I admire the work of Chad and Nic of Post Green homes. Take a look at their latest blog post where Chad talks about the small bedroom philosophy, and shares some cool panoramas of the interior of Avant Garage.
Fantastic piece from gbNYC on the need and value of data when in comes to green building in the commercial sector.
The codification of Green Standards is an enormously positive step toward making green building the norm.