The House bill would give the Pentagon a brand-new budget, allowing it to make the cuts in low-priority areas, preventing the reductions in military readiness that generals have been warning about. It prevents staffing cuts in the Border Patrol, and adds money for Israel and embassy security. It makes health care reform a target for special cuts, and even specifies that no money is to be spent on the community group known as Acorn, though that group has not existed since 2010.
But it allows no flexibility or extra money to prevent cuts to programs like unemployment benefits, nutrition aid, housing assistance and education grants. Republicans do not care about those programs and left the sequester cuts in place for them.
”From One Budget Fight to the Next - NYTimes.com
The sequester is quite alright with House Republicans. They can keep the cuts they like and remove the ones they don’t for next year’s budget.
On Meet The Press just a few minutes ago… Sen. Feinstein announces intentions to introduce legislation to ban assault weapons when the new Congress begins.
[Twitter]
It’s quotes like this that make me wish our politics were different. Glenn Hubbard was Romney’s chief economic advisor and now that the election is over he can openly say what everyone in Washington knows. We need to pull in more revenue and cut spending.
I recently got in a political argument with a Texan while walking my dog. (Yup, that happens)
If Hurricane Sandy has done anything good it’s that it has created a whiff of bipartisanship.
Go ahead, GOP. Fight him.
New nyt/cbs/q poll RT @jeffzeleny: …Likely voters who say economy getting better: OH-52%. FL-37%. VA-39%. Our story: nyti.ms/PkSCvP
— jmartpolitico (@jmartpolitico) October 31, 2012
The idea that news organizations are still taking polls in the middle of one of the worst natural disasters in the history of the nation is a little ridiculous.